jamesyerian


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2004 February
2004 January
2003 December
2003 November
2003 October
2003 September
2003 August
2003 July

My Links
Daily honoring the fallen in Iraq
Catholic Medical Mission Board--Largest US-Based Catholic Sponsored Charity Focused on Providing Healthcare to People in Developing Countries
American Catholic--News, Forums, Saints, Questions, Prayer Requests
Saint Jude Shrine
The Constitution of the United States of America incl. the Bill of Rights (among the rights that Congress must not infringe upon, the "right to abort" isn't one of them)
Media Research Center: The Leader in Documenting, Exposing and Neutralizing Liberal Media Bias
Times Watch: Documenting and Exposing the Liberal Political Agenda of the New York Times
News, Events, Opinion Straight from the Middle East Translated into English--Find out What the Arab World Really Thinks--Middle East Media Research Institute
Read any Ann Coulter Column Right Here
Catholic Online
Intellectual Conservative
Vital books: "The China Threat: How the People's Republic Targets America" and "Breakdown: How America's Intelligence Failures Led to September 11" both by Washington Times reporter Bill Gertz
The Drudge Report
Prevent Russia from turning back into the USSR--keep abreast of current events in Russia, sign presidential petitions--STAY INVOLVED
The real deal on healthcare-- just the facts.
Tax Foundation-- know the truth about your taxes
You wouldn't believe it if I told you. Buy "Betrayal: How the Clinton Administration Undermined American Security." "Betrayal" is too benign a word for the shocking damage to US security that Clinton was responsible for.
The Federalist, where Limited Government, as the Founding Fathers wanted it, is promoted.
What's the big deal with communism? 100 million deaths, oppression, and human misery, that's what. "The Black Book of Communism" documents history's greatest evil--edited by French historian Stephane Courtois. Buy it here.
City Journal
Join THE Conservative Forum on the Web Today
Facts and Logic about the Middle East
What Catholics Believe
Crisis Magazine (Catholic)
Human Events online
The Conspiracy to Keep you Poor and Stupid
National Review
FrontPage Magazine
Wall Street Journal on the web
The Weekly Standard
The Conservative Movement Starts Here
The Washington Times
Buy "Among the Heroes" by Jere Longman--the story of flight 93 (it will break your heart yet fill you with pride)
US House of Representatives
Just the Story, no Spin--Fox News Channel
The Heritage Foundation
National Rifle Association
Get your News from Any Source all Over the World, Right Here
The Declaration of Independnce of the United States of America
The Supreme Court of the United States
The President of the United States
US Senate
9/11: Never Forget
Students for Academic Freedom

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



Terror futures, the search for WMD and the sisters Hussein
07.31.03 (5:51 pm)   [edit]
I've been very busy today so I don't have any expansive blogs posted. However, two things happened today regarding Iraq that I find noteworthy. Well, three actually.

First, Donald Rumfeld said he didn't know about the "terror futures" fiasco and ordered DARPA to scap it immediately after he heard about it. Now, I know the Left treats everything from the right as a lie, and the conspiracists will smack their foreheads and go "don't you get it, man?!" (who knows, maybe the CIA will shell the US embassy in Canada to throw us off), but I tend to believe Rummy and Wolfowitz. Let's face it folks: "terror futures" is a really creepy, bad idea no matter how you look at it--even if it might have actually been practical

(note: Though I am no one to defend someone blindly, I will note that John Poindexter is much less of a nefarious creature than Marc Rich, who Bubba Clinton pardoned when he--thank God--left office.)

There is some hope on the WMD front. As I've said a couple of times in recent days, David Kelly is coming across some really good evidence of WMD--it's just taking time to put it all together (and it has only been 4 months, folks--it took UN weapons inspectors 12 years to find zilch). In the states today he has said that the case against Hussein is growing, and there is much, much more cooperation--Iraqis are coming out of the woodwork to actually "lead" insepctions.

Why this newfound cooperation? The Iraqi people don't see Hussein as much of a threat anymore. Why is this? Because we knocked off the brothers Hussein. Most Iraqis are convinced that we killed them, that they are no more, and that they can speak up about the regime. Of course, this I expected--as most rational people would. Just like no sane person expected a perfect Jeffersonian democracy to sprout up in Iraq, no sane person could honestly expect the US to find the WMD within a week--after all, Hussein had years to hide it, ship it, or trade it, and right after the war Iraqis weren't exactly keen on helping.

This stuff takes patience, folks.

Apparently, though, Saddam's daughters have sought asylum in Jordan because, according to Jordan, they feel "threatened" that the US might take them out. Seriously. Rub your eyes, slap your face, and read that again. Jordan says the decision to grant them asylum was based on "human rights", a strange position to take, considering Jordan is not a democracy and routinely violates human rights.

That is merely the Left's sniffling over the decision by US troops to kill the Hussein brothers, who by the way were shooting at them in a combat zone. It's not like the brothers got stopped by US troops for speeding on a Bagdhad highway and got their faces filled with lead--folks, these guys were responsible for the rape, murder, and torture of hundreds of thousands of people. Only the Left would dare criticize what our soldiers do in combat, or take the brothers Hussein's side.

But for Jordan to insist it has some sort of moral highground over the US is ridiculous. Up until very recently, they didn't recognize Israel, and they still don't allow Jews in the country. The country is 80% Palestinian, but is ruled by the Hashemite minority. And I mean ruled--despite the Western features of the king and queen, the "modern" appearance, the kind of appearance that gets Americans all weak with admiration--this place is tantamount to a dictatorship.

Jordan is not a nice place to be. The Hussein sisters would have been better off seeking asylum in this country, yet Jordan advances the myth that the sisters are in danger from the country that was the world's first democracy, with-still-the world's finest government philosophy (government exists for our convenience, and cannot trample our rights). and was the one that created the UN (for better or worse).

You couldn't pay me enough to go to the Middle East--our soldiers deserve the utmost thanks. We can never match their sacrifice. Two more of our boys died today, but the attacks seem to be less frequent. Let's hope this is a permanent trend.
 
Iraq operations providing intelligence on al-Qaeda: Myers
07.30.03 (7:01 pm)   [edit]
News story: http://story.news.yahoo.com/n...

' "We're getting very good intelligence from operations in Iraq on the al-Qaeda and it's been very helpful in understanding the network and tracking down some of the leadership," Myers told reporters at a press conference at Bagram Air Base, 50 kilometres (31 miles) north of Kabul.'

Don't expect the Left to take this seriously. More eye-rolling from them is to be expected. But this could help us further advance in the War on Terror. I don't for one minute think that all of these groups weren't communicating with each other. They are all connected in their hatred for Israel and the United States. They just hate the two countries for different reasons.
 
UN Without Shame
07.30.03 (6:57 pm)   [edit]
NY Post editorial: http://story.news.yahoo.com/n...

The UN recently voted to suspend "consultant status" from Reporters Without Borders because the organization criticized the decision by the UN to have Libya chair the UN Human Rights Commission. Libya is one one of the worst violaters of human rights on the planet (and is also not a Democracy).

If that doesn't illustrate the utter corruptness and hypocrisy of the UN, I don't know what does.

[b]Money quote: "And this is the same world body whose moral authority President Bush's critics insisted on enlisting before taking out one of the world's worst tyrants, Saddam Hussein?" [/b]

A good read.
 
US looking at one-billion dollar aid package to Afghanistan
07.30.03 (6:48 pm)   [edit]
News story:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/af p/20030728/pl_afp/us_afgh an_aid_030728194440" title="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/af p/20030728/pl_afp/us_afgh an_aid_030728194440" target="_blank"http://story.news.yahoo.com/n...

US to give 1 billion in aid to Afghanistan, up 300 million from last year (which was up 200 billion from their initial commitment). By doing this the US hopes to attact similar contributions at an upcoming donor's conference.

Good signs that the US isn't forgetting Afghanistan.
 
Israel Fears Attacks, Palestinians Appeal to Bush
07.30.03 (6:45 pm)   [edit]
News story:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm /20030729/wl_nm/mideast_d c_33" title="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm /20030729/wl_nm/mideast_d c_33" target="_blank"http://story.news.yahoo.com/n...

Here's the lowdown on this one: Israel basically predicts more terror attacks because the Palestinians haven't done a thing to adhere to their obligations under the "road map" (and according to PM Abbas, they are not going to), which is pretty much THE REQUIREMENT FOR GETTING A PALESTINIAN STATE, and the Palestinians are complaining bout a fence Israel is building in the West Bank (which, oh by the way, is not banned in the "road map"), and the issue of Israel releasing all six or seven thousand terrorists in Israeli prisons (something else not required in the "road map").

So far, Palestinians have done nothing regarding the peace plan, not a thing. Yet Israel has moved out of towns, released killers as a goodwill gesture (prisoners who will turn around and kill more men, women and chidlren), and has allowed more Palestinians to come back to work in Israel. As usual, Israel is conceding and doing real work for peace, the Palestinians are still doing nothing.

What do you expect from a group who doesn't really desire an "end to the occupation" (which isn't an occupation), but an end to Israel? Arafat still holds power, he still incites "death to Israel" sentiments, textbooks in Palestinian schools still fail to mention Israel on a map or in text, and Hamas and Hezbollah still dream of obliterating the Jewish states.

A writer in the National Review last week claimed that maybe Bush is doing to the Palestinians what he did to Hussein: give them one last chance to stand by their words, to really push for peace. Surely that sounds better than morally equating both sides (there is no comparison--Israel is the victim here). We'll have to see.

Either way, unless Arafat and Abbas truly crack down on terror, nothing will positive will be accomplished. And given their track records, it is doubtful that the two Palestinian terrorists will.
 
Workers Question US Officials about Trade with China
07.30.03 (6:34 pm)   [edit]
Harley Davidson employees grill the US Treasury Secretary about "free trade".

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/do wjones/20030730/bs_dowjon es/200307292144001822" title="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/do wjones/20030730/bs_dowjon es/200307292144001822" target="_blank"http://story.news.yahoo.com/n...

From this Dow Jones story:

"We as Americans believe in fair trade. We don't believe in free trade," said Robert Schuemann, executive vice president of Harley-Davidson supplier Sigmicast Corp., and one of those who quizzed the secretaries on U.S.-China trade relations.

There is also discussion about the Bush tax cut plan, which most supported (some didn't really care about the child tax credit). And there were some suspicions about the administration's proposals about overtime and comp time.

From the story:

"Chao [Labor Secretary Elaine Chao] responded that current proposals were not yet final, and that comments on the plan were still coming in.

She said the proposal is designed to give white-collar workers more control over their time. The plan also includes measures designed to make it harder to designate minimum-wage workers as managers who are exempt from overtime requirements.

'We want people who have earned overtime to be paid it,' Chao said. "

There are a couple of things that should be mentioned here. The tragedy of free trade with CHina is a bipartisan affair. President George HW Bush thought that it would be great to open the vast wealth of the US to CHina and the world with "free trade", and it was President Clinton that signed NAFTA into law and started routinely designating "Most Favored Nation" status to China. President George W Bush has given China permanent MFN status (of course this was agreed to by the Congress).

Does anyone remember Tibet? Or how about Tiananmen square in 1989? So afraid the rest of the world is of China that we are appeasing it--and making it more dangerous--with "free trade" and mollycoddling.

The Left I can understand supporting China this way, they are ideological cousins, but for Republicans I have no idea why they think that using 'free trade' as a foreign policy tool will change anything. If anything, it will make us more dependent on China for goods and services, eradicate our manufacturing and tech base, plunge us into lower living standards, and build up China's capacity to threaten us.

Any sort of stats about the 'benefits' of free trade are rubbish. It does not create good jobs. It creates Wal-Mart/McDonalds type jobs.

There's a reason why the rest of the world wants "free trade" with America. It's the same reason why they have lower priced drugs than the US--they want to free ride on America's wealth (with drugs, all major research and development occurs in the US--the other countries don't have to worry about passing off the cost of production on conusmers. If the US imports drugs, it will stop research and development, and yes, even more jobs will leave the US). I have a hard time swallowing any of our "allies" pushing for free trade.

America worked for its prosperity and now folks on both sides of the aisle want to give it away.




 
China warns Taiwan against referendum plan
07.30.03 (6:19 pm)   [edit]
New Story: [url=] http://story.news.yahoo.com/n... [/url]
or cut and paste this-- http://story.news.yahoo.com/n...

China warns Taiwan against holding referendum against on a nuclear power plant and entry into the WHO. Such referendums give the appearance of independence and may eventually lead to a vote confirming independence from China.

Of course, Taiwan is democratic, China is not. Tawian is considered a "breakaway" republic of China by the Chi-coms. The US is the main obstacle to getting Taiwan in line. And they are planning appropriately--see previous blog entry.

We should threaten them economically to get them to move on Taiwan (and N Korea) and speed up our missile defense systems both in Asia and at home.
 
Facts to know about the US "jackpot of death"
07.30.03 (4:24 pm)   [edit]
When we opine on things we have to know what the facts are. Some people around here still don't get that. While I think that whole "terror futures" thing is wrong and was rightly scrapped (it trivializes terror and belittles its seriousness), a fellow blogger took the idea of this "jackpot of death" and said a lot of things that weren't true. But then, what do we expect from the Left?

The facts:

*Bush and the Department of Defense didn't know about the program. The program was a proposal not by the Bush/CHeney "junta" but by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, whose mission it is to "think outside the box" regarding the fighting of terror and defense (and I think this would qualify as thinking outside the box). Paul Wolfowitz slammed the idea when he found out about it.

*The idea behind the "jackpot of death" was to better predict where a future terror attack might occur. THere are futures markets out there regarding everything, from hollywood to farms to presidential elections, and they often predict what will happen in those markets better than outside critics and intelligence. This would have been another aid in fighting the war on terror, proponents of the program have said.

From Reuters: ([url=]http://reuters.com/newsArticl...[/url] )

"The idea was seen as a means of aiding the Pentagon to predict terror events as part of its search for ways to prevent attacks, based on the predictive abilities of the markets.

"The price discovery process, with the prospect of profit and at pain of loss, is at the core of a market's predictive power," the program's Concept Overview said.

The plan would have allowed traders to buy futures contracts priced on the certainty of a particular event occurring in the Middle East. Investors could make money by spotting whether the contracts were over or under-priced.

One market analyst took a dim view.

"From one end, creating a futures market on terrorism makes sense because markets have major predictive powers," said Phil Flynn, vice president and senior market analyst with Alaron Trading Corp. in Chicago. "But not only could it help the good guys, it could also help the bad guys. The terrorists could use the same information that these markets provided to see where we would be the most vulnerable.""

(note: the idea of terrorists using information to their advantage this way is used by the Left to slam the "Jackpot of death" but is disregarded when Bush says he won't release the 28 pages about Saudi Arabia for the same reason--that terrorists could use the info against the US--what do we believe today, Lefties?)

To take the knee-jerk view that this is more evidence of an administration's desire to gain unprecedented power and kill Americans is yet another slander. The DAPRA's job is to be imaginative, to fight terror in new ways. This goes overboard, in my opinion, just like the so-called Terrorist Information Awareness.

I really don't understand how this is any different than Bush's predecessor's attempts to have every American put into a database that would "track" their consumption habits.

Back then we heard nary a peep from the Left. And, when something like the "jackpot of death" gets proposed by a Democratic prez in the future, we're not likely to hear them there, either.

If you're going to criticize, use facts.

 
From the land of 'duh': China aims missiles at Taiwan
07.30.03 (3:58 pm)   [edit]
God bless the Pentagon. They have consistently warned about China's aggressive actions toward Taiwan and the US for many years. While China was stealing our nuclear secrets and illegally giving campaing contributions to the Clintons in 1996, the Pentagon was watching and documenting the alarming rise in China's military spending and purchasing of Russian equipment. Since most people falsely believe that China is an ally, or worse, that it is no longer a communist state, we get along in our lives believing the same line that we believed after the USSR fell--that the Cold War, and the nuclear threat is over.

(This attitude is also the reason why our last President allowed Pakistan, India, and North Korea to get nukes.)

So in this news story, a Pentagon report shows that China is building short-range missiles to threaten Taiwan and Okinawa faster than they had thought. Okinawa is important because US troops are stationed there, and would be expected to be the first place of response from the US if communist China invaded democratic Taiwan.

"'Preparing for a potential conflict in the Taiwan Strait is the primary driver for China's military modernization," said the report on Beijing's military. The report, submitted annually to Congress, was released Wednesday.'

Yet again, the report also maintains that China spends much more on defense than they release to the public:

"U.S. officials estimate the military budget which Beijing announced as $20 billion early last year actually falls between $45 billion and $65 billion, and the report noted a potential for annual spending to increase three or four times by 2020."

And then the article makes this understatement:

"The modernization of China's military, under way for several years, appears to contradict Beijing's stated desire for a peaceful resolution of the reunification dispute over Taiwan."

Do ya think?

And our good "peaceful" buddies Russia, who are also arming North Korea, Iran, and armed Iraq, among basically every other third-world country, the country that wanted the US to "respect international law" with regards to Iraq, is helping China threaten Taiwan and the US:

"'For the fourth year in a row, China bought $2 billion worth of weapons from Russia, at least double its annual procurement from Moscow over the previous decade, according to the report.

'China's force modernization program is heavily reliant upon assistance from Russia and other states of the former Soviet Union,' the report said. 'China hopes to fill short-term gaps in capabilities by significantly expanding its procurement of Russian weapon systems and technical assistance over the next several years.'"

These weapons consist of anti-stealth subs and destroyers.

When you realize that China is not a friend of the US, then you can see why they are of no help regarding North Korea, and will probably respond to US force there like they did in the 1950s. They want us out of Asia, and have such an extensive spy network in the US that everything is compromised. The own the Panama canal, and are repopulating Panama and the surrounding countries there. They are in shady deals with US business men, compromising anything we do diplomatically with the Chinese.

The US has no "friends"--it's time we started working from that assumption.

Click on the link to read the full story: [url=]http://story.news.yahoo.com/n... [/url]
 
First peacekeepers arrive in Liberia
07.30.03 (3:40 pm)   [edit]
"First Peacekeepers Arrive in Chaotic Liberia" (click link below to read full story)
[url=]http://story.news.yahoo.com/n...[/url]

Well, there's the good news--that Nigeria sent an "advance inspection team" to Liberia to assess the situation (I think I could assess it pretty well without going there), part of the ECOWAS unit that hopes to put 3200 peacekeepers on the ground. Even Kofi Annan says the UN could free up funds to help out (that is so big of them! What the hell do they do over at the UN anyway?).

But then there's the bad news: despite it's initial role as giving logistical support, the US is portrayed in the article now as unsure over whether to put troops on the ground:

"In Washington, Pentagon spokesman Lawrence Di Rita said it was "too early" to say whether U.S. Marines, expected to arrive off Liberia's coast in warships by Saturday, would take part on the ground.

President Bush repeated demands that a cease-fire be in place, and President Charles Taylor gone, before any U.S. involvement.

"I also want to remind you, the troop strength will be limited and the time frame will be limited, and we're working on that," Bush told a White House news conference Wednesday."

So we may still put boots on the ground over there. How delightful. Of course, the Left and its press still clamor for this, with the Guardian stepping up the rhetoric.

Of course, like I have said, when the troops start dying over there, this will be Mr. Bush's war, in a place we have absolutely no business being in. Write the President and Congress: the UN, ECOWAS, and the African Union all have responsibilities to Liberia that the US doesn't; they have a mandate to help out that country.




 
One in 10 U.S. Tech Jobs May Move Overseas, Report Says
07.30.03 (4:20 am)   [edit]
Yet another article proving that NAFTA is hella good for the rest of the world, hella bad for us. Good jobs go overseas, the CEO and the third world worker rejoice: CEO saves millions, third world worker makes more money than he ever could. Meanwhile, back in Anytown, USA a man with a degree in computer engineering just became a "Wal Mart Sales Associate" and makes about $7/hr.

So remember, folks: when rabid free-traders say that NAFTA and globalization creates jobs, they aren't being honest. NAFTA and globalization ("free trade") does create jobs, but it doesn't create very good or very high-paying jobs.

Free trade bumpkins say that only the "jobs that no one wants to do in the US" go overseas, but it is simply not the case--if any job is cheaper overseas, than any job can go overseas. Now, the opposite of free trade, protectionism, is a proven failure. What needs to happen is this: countries that benefit from the US being too prosperous should float their currency, like the US does, and embrace the "rules" of the WTO, like the US does.

I'll admit that we could stand to lose some strenous government regulations, but that alone isn't a sufficient reason why we're losing our jobs. It's pure profit. I'm afraid that only when the US sinks to a third-world status will we be able to compete again, that is when our standard of living accepts the jobs at their current wage demand.

Meanwhile, in order to make up for lost revenue (if you make more money, you pay more taxes), the government will be jacking up income taxes to keep their programs afloat.

Europe, here we come.

Click on the link to read the story:[url=]http://story.news.yahoo.com/n...[/url]
 
Guess how the 'roadmap' is going. No, really--guess!
07.30.03 (4:00 am)   [edit]
Below is an article from HonestReporting.com, showing how both sides have abided by the 'roadmap to peace'. Interestingly, the report mentions that the release of Palestinian prisoners is NOT a requirement of the roadmap, yet the Washington Post, Reuters, and AFP all continue to report that it is.

This is a good read:

[url=]http://www.honestreporting.co...+the+prime+ministers+trav el+to+Washington%2C+obser vers+are+wondering%3A+Did +the+road+map+take+a+deto ur%3F[/url]
[b]
Off the Map: As the prime ministers travel to Washington, observers are wondering: Did the road map take a detour?[/b]

1) CRACKDOWN ON TERROR
The text of the road map calls on Palestinian leadership "to arrest, disrupt, and restrain individuals and groups conducting and planning violent attacks on Israelis anywhere."

Yet speaking in Cairo on Tuesday, Abbas rejected this most basic tenet. Abbas said that "Cracking down on Hamas, Jihad and the Palestinian organizations is not an option at all."

Associated Press, however, creates an opposite impression with this July 20 headline: "Palestinians Outlaw Violent Groups." You have to read the article to find out that the PA merely recycled a 1998 law that outlaws violence and corruption.

Meanwhile London's Independent reported: "Details are emerging of how, in an effort to shore up the splits in Fatah and the Al-Aqsa Brigades, Abu Mazen's government has been paying militant leaders to honour the ceasefire. A Palestinian minister admitted that payments had been made, but did not confirm rumours that one leader received as much as $10,000."

This report, buried in the fifth paragraph of the Independent article, appeared nowhere else in major world media. PA payments to terrorist leaders violate both the text and the spirit of the road map's call for the dismantling of terror groups. Isn't that newsworthy?

2) ARAFAT'S INVOLVEMENT
A fundamental component of the road map is the replacement of Arafat as Palestinian leader. Arafat, however, continues to play a decisive role. The Jerusalem Times, a Palestinian weekly, reported (July 17) that Arafat and Abbas "settled their differences" with a deal that allowed Arafat to retain control over the two most essential portfolios: negotiations with Israel, and head of the PA security committee.

Arafat is now directly undermining the peace process, to the point of supplying financial and political support to armed groups that reject the current cease-fire. In a front-page expose, the Boston Globe (July 23) quotes the Palestinian governor of Jenin, Haider Irsheid, who was recently kidnapped and beaten by Arafat's thugs:

"Arafat knows of and supports the continuing payments to the militant groups despite their rejection of the cease-fire. The governor said Fatah is making the payments in numerous places in the West Bank, even as internal Palestinian reforms and US pressure have begun to choke off previous sources of funding for the paramilitary groups.

"Abdel Fattah al Hamayel, who is a Fatah leader and a Palestinian Authority minister without portfolio, confirmed that Fatah is providing money to the Brigades."

As well, Arafat continues to incite Palestinians to violence. Last week, the Jerusalem Post reported that Arafat called on Palestinian children to follow the "martyrdom" example of Fares Odeh, a 13-year-old boy from Gaza who has been immortalized posthumously by a photograph showing him throwing stones at an IDF tank.

3) TERROR ATTACKS
While there has been a reduction in terror attacks against Israelis since the intra-Palestinian "truce," they are continuing at a rate that no other country would find acceptable. And yet, the media has virtually ignored this latest spate of attacks:

An Israeli cyclist was stabbed in Jerusalem on Wednesday (July 23); he was rushed to Hadassah Hospital with the knife still lodged in his back. On Sunday (July 20), a 64-year-old Jerusalem man was stabbed in the city's upscale Yemin Moshe neighborhood. Two suicide bombers, members of Islamic Jihad, were caught on Thursday (July 24) en route to perpetrate attacks. An Israeli soldier, Oleg Shaichat, remains missing, thought to have been kidnapped in the manner that an Israeli taxi driver was kidnapped last week. (Meanwhile, Hizbullah shelling continues on northern Israel, injuring two civilians, one seriously.)

A Palestinian Authority report, issued prior to the recent stabbings, documents 26 separate terror incidents since Palestinian factions announced their cease-fire. In the month of June, terror accounted for 31 Israeli deaths and 179 wounded. The report cites four suicide bombings, mortar fire, anti-tank rocket fire, shots fired at IDF patrols, and last week's stabbing in Tel Aviv which killed a 24-year-old Israeli -- an attack claimed by Arafat's Martyrs' Brigades.

4) PRISONER RELEASE
Many Western media are continuing to report (wrongly) that prisoner releases are a condition of the road map. As was frequently the case during the "Oslo years," lazy (or biased) journalists have not bothered to read the text of Israeli-Palestinian agreements about which they report. Instead they have simply swallowed lines from Palestinian spokespersons as if they were fact. Reporters have thus left readers with the impression that Israel has not fulfilled agreements and is responsible for delaying peace initiatives.

Following recent criticism, however, some media have started to correctly report that Palestinian demands for a large-scale prisoner release is not a condition of the road map. Others (notably the Washington Post, Reuters and AFP) have not.

• THE WASHINGTON POST continued to mislead readers (which, of course, include many politicians in Washington). In the report, "Mideast Parties Now Look to U.S. Sharon-Abbas Meeting Stalls Over 'Road Map'" (July 21), John Ward Anderson writes: "The peace plan, known as the road map, has stalled over several key issues -- notably... Palestinian demands for... the release of thousands of Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails. "

• REUTERS' July 21 report by Dan Williams implies that prisoner releases are a central to the road map: "Israel agreed to free hundreds more Palestinian prisoners Sunday, disappointing Palestinian Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas's hopes for a full amnesty but keeping a U.S.-backed peace 'road map' in motion."

• AFP (Agence France Presse), the world's third biggest news agency, also implied (July 21) that prisoner releases are a condition of the road map: "...Abbas was referring to the US-backed international roadmap for peace which outlines steps both sides must take toward creating by 2005 a Palestinian state that lives peacefully alongside Israel. Abbas, who is also known as Abu Mazen, refused to budge on the release of prisoners."

• ASSOCIATED PRESS, by contrast, is now reporting this point correctly (July 21): "The release of prisoners is not spelled out as an Israeli obligation in the so-called 'road map' peace plan, but Palestinian security chief Mohammed Dahlan said the releases are 'at the top of our agenda'."

Remarkably, Israel remains flexible and accommodating on this issue, voluntarily agreeing to release hundreds of Palestinians from Israeli detention as a goodwill gesture.

SUMMARY

Now let's get this all straight:

Abbas is paying the terrorists not to attack; Arafat is paying them to attack. Either way, terrorists are making a lot of money.

The road map obligates the Palestinians to crack down on terrorists; instead, the Palestinians are demanding their release.

As the prime ministers travel to Washington, HonestReporting wonders: Is something wrong here?

Copyright © 2003 HonestReporting - http://www.honestreporting.co...





 
A letter from a soldier--what's going on in Iraq
07.29.03 (3:01 pm)   [edit]
Perhaps you've already seen this letter from a Green Beret (who asked that he remain anonymous--just "Mark"). Of course, the national media doesn't touch this because it would get in the way of lying about Iraq. Most media outlets on the web, however, have printed this. I figure it should be printed here, to give a dose of reality to the conspiracy-huggers:


COL ******** wrote:


(Language may be a bit off color to some and it is long. However, it is well worth the read. I recommend it. )


Original message, which came from e-mail thread out of SOCOM (spec. ops command) in Tampa, it is from Army spec. ops


It Ain't Necessarily So.
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003, 11:09:09 GMT


Hey Guys, sorry it's been so long since I've sent anything but a quick note to you individually. However things have been pretty hectic since the end of hostilities and the start of the real war. Despite what the assholes in the press like to say over and over about the Ba'ath Party and Feydaheen.
2) It isn't any worse than expected;
3) Things are getting better each day, and
4) The morale of the troops is A-1, except for the normal bitching and griping.


My brief love affair with the press, especially the guys who had the cajones to be embedded with the troops during the fighting, is probably over, especially since we are back being criticized by them same Roland Headly types that used to hang around the Palestine Hotel drinking Baghdad Bob's whiskey and parroting his ridiculous B.S.


I'm in Baghdad now, since XXXXXX relocated here from Qatar. It looks, sounds and smells about the same but at least you can get Maker's Mark at the local OC. We came up in mid-June to help set up operation Scorpion and Sidewinder. It represents a major (and long overdue) shift in tactics. Instead of being sitting ducks for the ragheads we now are going after the worthless pieces of fecal matter.


I'm no longer baby-sitting the pukes from CNN and the canned hams from the networks, but have a combat mission coordinating a bunch of A teams, seeking, finding and rooting out the mostly non-Iraqis that are well-armed, well-paid (in U.S. dollars) and always waiting to wail forthe press and then shoot some GI in the back in the midst of a crowd.


The only reason the GIs are pissed (not demoralized) is that they cannot touch, must less waste, those taunting bags of gas that scream in their faces and riot on cue when they spot a camera man from ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN or NBC. If they did, then they know the next nightly news will be about how chaotic things are and how much the Iraqi people hate us.


Some do. But the vast majority don't and more and more see that the GIs don't start anything, are by-and-large friendly, and very compassionate, especially to kids and old people. I saw a bunch of 19 year-olds fromthe 82nd Airborne not return fire coming from a mosque until they got a group of elderly civilians out of harm's way. So did the Iraqis.


A bunch of bad guys used a group of women and children as human shields.The GIs surrounded them and negotiated their surrender fifteen hours later and when they discovered a three year-old girl had been injured by the big tough guys throwing her down a flight of stairs, the GIs called in a MedVac helicopter to take her and her mother to the nearest field hospital. The Iraqis watched it all, and there hasn't been a problem inthat neighborhood since. How many such stories, and there are hundreds of them, never get reported in the fair and balanced press? You know, nada.


The civilians who have figured it out faster than anyone are the local teenagers.


They watch the GIs and try to talk to them and ask questions about America and Now wear wrap-around sunglasses, GAP T- shirts, Dockers (or even better Levis with the red tags) and Nikes (or Egyptian knock-offs, but with the "swoosh") and love to listen to AFN when the GIs play it on their radios.


They participate less and less in the demonstrations and help keep us informed when a wannabe bad-ass shows up in the neighborhood.


The younger kids are going back to school again, don't have to listen to some mullah rant about the Koran ten hours a day, and they get a hot meal.


They see the same GIs who man the corner checkpoint, helping clear the playground, install new swingsets and create soccer fields. I watched a bunch of kids playing baseball in one playground, under the supervision of a couple of GIs from Oklahoma. They weren't very good but were having fun, probably more than most Little Leaguers


The place is still a mess but most of it has been for years. But the Hospitals are open and are in the process of being brought into the 21stCentury. The MOs and visiting surgeons from home are teaching their docs new techniques and One American pharmaceutical company (you know, the kind that all the hippies like to scream about as greedy) donated enough medicine to stock 45 hospital pharmacies for a year.


Safe water is more available.
Electricity has been restored to pre-war levels but saboteurs keep cutting the lines. And The old Ba'ath big shots are upset because they can't get fuel for their private generators. One actually complained to General McKeirnan, who told him it was a rough world.


The MPs are screening the 80,000 Iraqi police force and rehabbing the ones that weren't goons, shake-down artists or torturers like they did in East Berlin, Kosovo and Afghanistan.
There are dual patrols of Iraqi cops and U.S./U.K./Polish MPs now in most of the larger cities.
Basra has 3.5 million inhabitants.
Mosul is a city of 2 million.
Kirkuk has 1 million.
How many and hundreds of other small towns have not had riots or shootings? The vast majority.


The six U.K. cops were killed in a small Shiite town by the ex-cops they were re-habbing.
According to a Royal Marine colonel I talked to, the town now has about twenty permanent vacancies in its police force.
Mick, he's a big potato eater from Belfast named XXXXX and knows how to handle terrorists after twenty years fighting with the IRA. He sends his regards and says he'd love to have you here. Thinks you'd make a great police chief, even though the cops would be more frightened of you than the local hoods (then he laughed)


I heard one doofus on MSNBC the other night talk about how "nearly 60" GIs have been killed since 01 May. The truth is that 21 GIs have been killed in combat, mostly from ambush, from 01 May through 30 June, Another 29 have been killed by accidents or other causes (two drowned while swimming in the Tigris).


The [MSNBC turd] is the same jerk who reported on the air that "dozens of GIs" were badly burned when two RPGs hit a truck belonging to an Engineer Battalion that was parked by a construction site. The truck was hit and burned, three GIs received minor injuries (including the driver who burnt his hand) and three warriors of Allah were promptly sent to enjoy their 72 slave girls in Paradise. Hell of a way to get laid.


A mosque in that shithole Fallujah blew up this morning while the local
imam, a creep named Fahlil (who was one of the biggest local loudmouths that frequently appeared on CNN) was helping a Syrian Hamas member teach eight teenagers how to make belt bombs. Right away the local Feyhadeen propaganda group started wailing that the Americans hit it with a TOW missile (If they had there wouldn't have been any mosque left!) and the usual suspects took to the streets for CNN and BBC. One fool was dragging around a piece of tin with blood on it, claiming it was part of the missile.


The cameras rolled and the idiot started repeating his story, then one of my guys asked him in Arabic where he had left the rag he usually wore around his face that made him look like a girl. He was a local leader of the Feyhadeen. We took the clown in custody and were asked rather indignantly by the twit from BBC if we were trying to shut up "the poor man who had seen his mosque and friends blown up." I told the airy-fairy who the raghead was and if he knew Arabic (which he obviously didn't) he'd know he was a Palestinian. I suggested we take him down to the local jail and we'd lock him and his cameraman in a cell with the "poor man" and they could interview him until we took him to headquarters. They declined the invitation.


Guess what played on the Bullshit Broadcasting System that evening? Did the
Americans blow up a mosque? See the poor man who is still in a state of shock over losing his mosque and relatives? Yep. Our friend the
Palestinian.


Our search and destroy missions are largely at night, free of reporters and
generally terrifying to those brave warriors of Allah. The only thing that frightens them more is hearing the word "Gitmo". The word is out that a trip to Guantanimo Bay is not a Caribbean vacation and they usually start squealing like the little mice they are, when an interrogator mentions "Gitmo". No wonder the International Red Cross, the National Council of Churches and the French keep protesting about the place. They know it has proven to be very effective in keeping several hundred real fanatical psychopaths in check and very frankly would rather see them cut loose to go kill some more GIs or innocent Americans, just to make W. look bad.


We have about 200 really bad guys in custody now and probably will park them in the desert behind a triple roll of razor wire, backed up by a couple of Bradleys pointed their way, if they decide to riot. Maybe a few will get to Gitmo but most are human garbage that wouldn't take on your five-year old grandson face-to-face. The more we go after them and not vice-versa I think we will see the sniper attacks go down. Yeah, they'll get lucky now and then, but it's showtime, fellows.


Our first objective is to get the die-hards off the street (or make them too
scared to come out in them) and destroy their caches of weapons (we have
collected more than 227,000 A-47s and that is only the tip of the iceburg;
Curly bought nearly a million of them from our pal Vladimir), then cut off
their money supply, mostly from Syria and Lebanon. We must continue to get
public services up and running, so the local families can get water, sewage
and garbage service; electricity, public transportation; oil fields and
refineries working and a dinar that won't halve in value every month.


It's going to be a long haul (remember it took 10-15 years in Japan and West
Germany) but if we don't stick with it, nobody else will, and we'll have
some other looney running the place again.


This place has greater potential than Saudi Arabia (bunch of goat-herders
who struck black gold) or Iran (weird dudes who can't run a rug bazaar much
less a major country).


Armageddon, here we come. Remember, it's located on the outskirts of
Jerusalem.


Enough of that cheery speculation.
The good news is that General Schoonmaker is going to appointed ChiefArmy
and the old man is coming to Tampa to run the SpOps desk at CentComm. He's
tops and will be getting his second star. To me it means that SpOps will be
more predominant in future operations and after 18 years as a GB maybe I'll
have a shot at a bird-level combat command. XXXXXXXXXX I told him after I spent four months changing the
diapers of the media types, I wanted to go back to action. Hence, my
current gig. As the movie quoted old General Patton, "God help me, I love
it." I do. Nothing more satisfying than working with the BEST damn soldiers
in the world, flushing real human poop down the drain and giving some folks
a chance at trying freedom for a change. They may learn to like it and then
my great-great-grandson won't have to worry about some maniac trying to
destroy the planet.


My tour is over at the end of August, and I plan to return to XXXX, brief
the old man, then head to XXXX and see my two sweethearts. I'd like
to visit my parents in XXXX and my brother in XXXXX, before taking on a
trip across the country. Just like any other family. It will charge my
batteries before I end up back in some other shit ... er, interesting and
challenging location. I hope to see most of you and ask for some advice,
not support. I know I've had that all along. Thanks.


Now about that Maker's Mark.


God Bless America
Mark.


"War doesn't determine who wins, war determines who is left"


**Since this letter, Paul Bremer and many other Iraqi and US officials have said similar things. It is only the left and their craven deference to lie and accuse Bush of every evil thing under the sun (and thereby root for Hussein and everything Bush is fighting, including national security) that make this stuff up. And their press is tagging along, hoping, praying, chest-beating for a VIetnam "quagmire".


Let's hope and pray that we can avoid armageddon. If we could work on this, on making Iraq a better place than Saddam left it, maybe we can avoid more misery down the road. The Left needs to get with it and support our troops--even if it means supporting their commander.


The Left is disgusting. They don't deserve to hold power.




 
Why Bush won't declassify 28 pages of 9/11 report
07.29.03 (2:05 pm)   [edit]
It's amazing that folks like WinstonSmith and other mad-with-hate conspiracy theorists on the Left would rather trust the rantings of Saudi Arabia and a few Senators than trust the President who has not lied, contrary to the blather of the Left, and who has done a masterful job of winning the war on terror--even getting Saudi Arabia to do something about it.

President Bush stated today why he won't release the 28 pages on Saudi Arabia, despite the protest of Republican Richard Shelby and most of the Left (still trying to find something to run against Bush on):

Said Bush today:

WASHINGTON - President Bush refused Tuesday to declassify part of a congressional report on possible links between Saudi government officials and the Sept. 11 hijackers, saying that "would help the enemy" by revealing intelligence sources and methods."

"I absolutely have no qualms at all, because there's an ongoing investigation into the 9-11 attacks, and we don't want to compromise that investigation," Bush said at a news conference with Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon the Rose Garden.

"If people are being investigated, it doesn't make sense for us to let them know who they are"

"Moreover, Bush said, "declassification of that part of a 900-page document would reveal sources and methods that would make it harder for us to win the war on terror. ... It would help the enemy if they knew our sources and methods." "

It is interesting that those that want the documents opened are not saying that Bush is trying to hide something--Bob Graham, the boring Presidential candidate from Florida, thinks that they should be opened so the Saudis can use the intelligence to fight terror, for example.

Absolutely no one, save the hate-filled zealots on the far-left, and the sorry people that parrot them line-by-line, believe Bush has anything to hide.

It might just be, folks, that Bush does care about this country. It might just be, folks, that he doesn't want current sleeper cells in the country to change their methods if the report were to be released. [b]It might just be that Bush knows that Saudi Arabia will use the intel in the 9/11 report not to better fight terror, but to use it to their advantage in terrorist attacks against the US in the future--after all, if we remember, 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi, and of course, bin Laden is a Saudi. Does it make any sense whatsoever to let the enemy know what you know about them? [/b]It might just be, folks, that since Bush wakes up every morning and meets with the FBI, the CIA, the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security, Bush might know what he's talking about.

Bush has not lied about anything--yet every day the Left continues its attempt to get to power. Clearly, the ends justifiy the means here. THere is no respect for process, there is no respect at all. Slander, false allegations, witch hunts--that's the Left for you. They see life as political, and it's ironic: though they claim to live in shades of gray ("no objective truth"), they see their political battle as black and white--Left is good, Republicans bad.

SO when they are in power, we can debate the meaning of "is" (no objective truth, you see), but when running for President we can take an issue as intricate and delicate as fighting the war on terror and the intel that comes from that, and speak in absolutes. That's the Left's game plan--logic chop, dumb down arguments for political gain, speak in absolutes, and then reverse the whole process when in power.

Of course, what can you expect. These idiots merely replaced God with their ideology.

This is the news story where I received the bulk of the 9/11 report study from:

[b]http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=5 44&e=1&u=/ap/20030729/ap_ on_go_pr_wh/attacks_intel ligence" title="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=5 44&e=1&u=/ap/20030729/ap_ on_go_pr_wh/attacks_intel ligence" target="_blank"http://story.news.yahoo.com/n...[/b]

I can't wait to further read what the intelligence experts on this meaningless blog have to say next. Or, rather, what they have to regurgitate from their far-left spin masters.



 
The Left is incapable of respecting the law
07.29.03 (2:59 am)   [edit]
Most people today think Judeo-Christian morals are old fashioned. Kids snicker at rules and regulations, and ways we should behave in society. Tragic consequences of immoral behavior now become admirable, for example: in the 1940s a single woman with three kids was a tragedy. Today that woman is a hero for "choosing" her single life, for doing it her way, etc. We try and operate on an ethics system in today's world that has absolutely no root in adherence: since we essentially worship ourselves, we can always change the rules.

Our Constitution and Declaration of Independence are not inherently Christian documents, yet are based on Judeo-Christian principles. THe US was founded by Christian men, most of them protestant, who followed the law NOT because a law "existed", or that they all agreed on what a "law" should be, but because there were perceived norms of behavior that translated into the law. These norms of behavior were shaped by Judeo-Christian principles. In short, our brilliant government documents were filtered through a reverence for God and Christian tradition.

Hence, there was a respect for the Law, just as these men had respect for God. Throughout the years the US was subject to political turmoil--our Civil War being the culmination of it all, and the various scandals, etc. But the system of government, the political machine was respected. Transer of power in government was easy, the process was respected.

However, with the advent of the 20th century and especially World War I, modernism developed and bloomed, treating truth not as an objective reality, but as something different for each one of us. Moral relativism came creeping in, along with an unjust love of self, of pride. In the USSR the throwing away of God manifested itself in the Communist revolution, starting a chain reaction of empire that ultimately killed 100 million people before the end of the Cold War in 1991 (USSR and China's oppressive government killed almost 90 million alone). Here in the west, the Left was prevented from overthrowing government because most Americans were still Christian. The average American, therefore, still respected God and law; the average American Lefitst, however, took refuge in the city and the university, rolling their eyes at the "old fasioned" American and re-writing our history.

Today, the Left's incessant and violent ideology is finally starting to make dents. Since man is a God under Leftist ideology, laws don't matter, decorum doesn't matter, only the ends matter. And the ends are power--they want to tell everyone else how to live, what to do, etc., while they retain the power. When you understand this, then you can see why our Constitution keeps getting new "rights" attached to it, like abortion. All of a sudden the Constitution can mean whatever the Left wants it to mean, just so long as their agenda gets across.

And only a group of people who believe they are Gods would ever think that murdering a baby in utero is a sane option for healthy living.

In the past, process mattered, but no more. Now more than ever, the zeal of the Left to power trumps everything else. So what do we have? We have Al Gore trying to steal the 2000 election by counting the votes in each county differently, a clear violation of the 14th amendment. In their mythmaking, the Left insists the Supreme Court gave Bush the 2000 election, but anyone who bothered to read the decisions would know that Bush's lead in Florida, under any count, was always there. It was Gore who tried to fudge the numbers. It was Gore who was trying to get "selected, not elected."

Since then the Left has tried mightily to overthrow Bush and stall him. Therefore we have complete Oliver-Stonish mythmaking regarding Iraq, we have Leftists arguing against the US and international law and rooting for Hussein, we have them flying to Iraq to demoralize the same troops the claim to support. Despite clear evidence to the contrary, Bush's tax cuts are not "for the rich"--doesn't anyone know how to read the data? They claim that the US is going to have a 44 trillion dollar deficit someday, failing to mention that it will be out of a 682 trillion dollar economy over 75 years, which is just over 6%, and further failing to mention that their pet program Medicare will be responsible for 37 trillion of it. They scare granny into thinking Bush is going to take away her coverage so they can continue to rake in the special interest money.

And then we have the reall dirty stuff--judges. Judicial activism has run amok with the left--recently the Supreme Court of the United States basically ruled that racism is ok and that the 14th amendment doesn't matter, and that state legislatures have no right to make laws and that a right to privacy trumps the law--paving the way for incest and pedophilia to make its way into mainstream US culture. The Supreme Court had no legal basis to rule in those two cases the way they did: it was just "old fashioned" to continue with having states ban things like sodomy (forgetting that it is not their function to say this--these powers belong to the states). In the Texas sodomy case, they laughably used the examples of foreign nations to justify their decisions--even though it is unconstitutional for them to do so.

(And let's not forget Nevada's leftist Supreme Court saying that the people of the state do not matter regarding tax legislation. The state requires 2/3 vote to pass tax legislation, the Supreme Court of Nevada overthrew this law--welcome to the new kingdom! No democracy here!)

We have Democrats in Texas running to Oklahoma or New Mexico when the Republicans try and by law change the voting districts. We have Democrats in the US Senate fillibustering judicial nominees merely because they are pro-life. This is unconstitutional--all that is required to confirm a judicial nominee is a majority vote, but it will take 60 votes to break the fillibuster. All because the Dems are afraid that someday Roe v. Wade might be overturned, throwing the question of legality of abortion back to the states.

Time and again the Democrats have no shame--the ends always justify their means, no matter how ugly and illegal the means are. They do not respect the law, and they do not respect the law because they embrace modernism, marxism, and atheism. And because they embrace these nefarious ideologies, they render themselves incapable of respecting the Judeo-Christian principles that founded the country, the principles that made our country the greatest that ever existed. The ideologies are simply uncompatible. One is a reaction to the other. They cannot coexist. Respect for the process in this country, for adherence to law, suffers.

So what we have is the Left feverishly trying to turn this country into a third-world bananna republic, one where laws mean nothing and tyranny and confusion reign. And I have to say that they're doing a very good job of it.



 
Story: Liberia gets worse as west Africa fails to respond
07.28.03 (1:29 pm)   [edit]
ECOWAS fails to set a time frame for peacekeepers, and I know why: they want the US to go in first, part of this "psychological" boost pap they and the Left want (basically, they don't want to do their jobs).

Where is the UN here? Liberia, again, is the responsibility of the UN, ECOWAS, and the African Union. President Bush has been clear, despite the claim in this article otherwise, that the US will provide intelligence and transport services but will not put troops on the ground, at least until Taylor leaves.

While I don't want our boys on the ground at all, the UN, ECOWAS, and the AU need to act responsibly. We are not Liberia's keeper--they are.

Internal conflicts require the type of long-term solutions that a foreign presence cannot give. Yes, we got involved in Vietnam and Korea, two civil wars, but our national security was at stake because of the empirical designs of communism and the USSR.

Again, if Taylor was serious about stepping down, he'd ask for UN, ECOWAS, or AU peacekeepers to transport him out of the country, or he'd get his own troops to do it for him. He has no plans to step down, and when American troops arrive, he'll start a larger war with them in it.

Meanwhile, the Left keeps pushing for action in Liberia, in which we have no national interest at stake, and demonizing our involvement in Iraq, in which we have national security at stake. Disgusting.

[b]Yahoo! News - Rebels seize key city in Liberia as west Africa fails to respond to crisis[/b]

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/a fp/20030728/wl_afp/liberi a_030728193823&e=1&ncid=" title="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/a fp/20030728/wl_afp/liberi a_030728193823&e=1&ncid=" target="_blank"http://story.news.yahoo.com/n...

MONROVIA (AFP) - Liberian rebels seized the second port city of Buchanan as the war-battered capital Monrovia remained in the grip of fierce combat and west African leaders failed to fix a date to send peacekeepers to end the brutal war.

Rebels from the smaller Movement for Democracy in Liberia movement stormed into Buchanan in the morning and wrested it after a fierce battle, residents said, adding that government troops fled the garrison there towards Monrovia.

A humanitarian source said government militiamen had looted cars and other property belonging to international aid agencies before fleeing, leaving the city in rebel control.

However, Liberian Defence Minister Daniel Chea said government forces were still in control of at least part of the city, located some 100 kilometres (60 miles) southeast down the Atlantic coast from the capital.

"We are controlling the west part of the town, the crossroad leading to Monrovia... (and) they are controlling the centre of the town," he said.

In Monrovia, detonations were heard at regular intervals as forces of the Liberians United for Reconciliation and Democracy (LURD) main rebel movement pressed on with their two-week-old siege on the city.

The shifting front lines in fighting for control of three key bridges have returned to positions of two days ago, military sources said early Monday.

Meanwhile, top officials from the 15-nation Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) regional bloc Monday failed to fix a date for the deployment of a long awaited and long overdue peacekeeping force.

A military source at a meeting of west African military chiefs in Ghana said that the officials concluded instead that a separate mission must first be sent to evaluate the situation.

An initial Nigerian force was to have been the vanguard for a 3,000-strong ECOWAS peacekeeping force, agreed upon earlier this month by the regional bloc.

As the LURD showed no sign of halting their offensive on Monrovia, the most brutal attack on the city in their nearly five-year war against President Charles Taylor, UN chief Kofi Annan issued a stern warning to the rebels.

"I think by this reckless behaviour that is killing many innocent Liberians and making it impossible for us to deliver humanitarian assistance, they are disqualifying themselves from any future role in Liberian life," he said.

Amid mounting anger over US inaction in the crisis, US President George W. Bush last Friday ordered the deployment of an amphibious task force off the coast of Liberia -- which was founded by freed American slaves in 1822 -- but their mandate remains unclear.

The fighting in Monrovia has claimed more than 1,000 mainly civilian lives in two weeks, according Taylor, creating a massive humanitarian crisis in Liberia's capital.

Up to 200,000 people are living without shelter in the city, and little food or clean water is available.

As Buchanan fell on Monday, hundreds of terrified Liberians swarmed to the Firestone Rubber Plantation, the largest of its kind in Africa, to join some 50,000 displaced people already living there either in camps or with relatives and friends.

Taylor, whose forces now control only around a fifth of the country following nearly five years of fighting, reaffirmed over the weekend he would quit in line with a west African-brokered peace plan, but repeated his demand that peacekeepers would have to arrive first.

He has accepted an offer of asylum in Nigeria.

US Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz reiterated Sunday that US forces would not enter the country without a ceasefire and until Taylor leaves power.
 
Bob Graham, 9/11 Failures, and Impeachment
07.28.03 (12:27 pm)   [edit]
Bob Graham has recently said that he’ll leave it to the “American people” to decide whether to impeach George Bush or not. This is wrong on so many levels.

Congress doesn’t really have the moral authority to impeach Bush over Iraq. The War Powers act of the 1970s reaffirms the President’s role as commander in chief—while Congress can declare war, the President does have the power to send troops and commit them to fighting without a declaration of war (as Bill Clinton did in Kosovo). Secondly, the Congressional resolution authorizing the president to use force was not a declaration of war—in short, the Congress passed that decision to George Bush.

This is not surprising, because Congress hasn’t formally declared war (like stated “we declare war”) since World War II. Why? It is politically risky to do so. If a Congressman votes directly for war and it turns into a Vietnam-like “quagmire”, then that vote is duly recorded and he/she will be accountable for it. If a Congressman votes directly against war and it turns into a smashing success, then he/she is accountable for that lack of support. It is much easier for Congress to act like the UN and give the appearance of legitimacy, passing “resolutions” that are basically soft declarations of war, than it is for them to perform their Constitutional duty as Congressmen and use their power.

And as I’ve stated quite often, the President is not a king: Congress still has the real power in the United States.

If Congress had put up Iraq to a formal declaration of war, and it failed, that would have constrained the time frame Bush would have had to act against Iraq, and would have put the issue up for a vote at a later time (regarding funding, etc). But the President does have considerable leeway in how he uses the troops.

Graham also doesn’t seem to remember that he was the chair of the Senate Intelligence Oversight Committee when 9/11 happened. He’s out there yapping about Bush’s 9/11 intelligence failures (which, since he was in office for 8 months before the terrorist attacks, and al Qaeda has openly admitted it has planned for the attacks since the mid-1990s, we really can’t blame him for), about how Bush himself failed to connect the dots, but Graham saw the same intelligence Bush did! Really, folks, was there anyone on the Democrat-controlled intelligence committee then that warned of 9/11? Was there anyone that connected the dots?

Graham proves again that the Left doesn’t understand the Constitution, and doesn’t feel it is responsible for its constituents when representing them in Congress. Mr. Graham, no one connected the 9/11 dots. You blame Bush for the failures of the previous administration, but during all of this, you sat on your perch at the intelligence committee and failed to connect the dots yourself.

The intelligence failures were the result of poor meshing of intelligence of the various agencies, the gutting of the CIA over the last 30 years (especially during the Clinton administration), and the inability of the Clinton administration to act on intelligence it already had—we probably wouldn’t be talking about 9/11 if President Clinton had nabbed bin Laden on the numerous times the terrorist was offered to him by other governments (if you remember, bin Laden was responsible for three terror attacks against the US in the 1990s: Khobar Towers, the embassy bombings in Africa, and the USS Cole).

This is what you can expect when the Left gets into power: useless troop deployments, and “kick-the-can” diplomacy. Then a Republican president will come around, clean up the mess, and get criticized for that, too.

Bob Graham, to say the least, is not fit to be President of the United States.




 
America's Fifth Column Goes to Iraq to Demoralize the Troops
07.28.03 (2:55 am)   [edit]
[b]America's Fifth Column Goes to Iraq[/b]
By Ben Johnson
FrontPageMagazine.com | July 28, 2003

=http://www.yourlink.com

When the left failed to prevent the American military from entering Iraq, it turned from protest to sabotage of the liberation effort. Conducting illegal "direct actions" to disrupt everyday life, so-called peace activists organized illegal demonstrations to shut down key financial districts and tie up homeland security forces. While some tried to close Oakland’s seaport, others stormed military bases and called on American troops to desert their posts en masse. Now, as the Bush Administration attempts to consolidate its victory and restore order to a liberated Iraq the radical Left has stepped up its sabotage effort, this time inside Iraq itself.

For the first time since the abortive efforts of the "human shields" who volunteered to protect Saddam Hussein from American missile strikes, radicals are putting themselves on the battle line. An organization calling itself the “International Occupation Watch Center” has set up shop in Baghdad with the express purpose of inciting U.S. troops to seek discharges and be sent home as conscientious objectors. It is inciting defection of troops at war by (technically) other means.

This latest assault on the American military is designed to undermine the difficult task of securing the perimeter of the war on terror in the Middle East. Ba'athist guerrilla strikes claim roughly one American life a day. General John Abizaid recently classified this wave of warfare as “a classical guerrilla-type campaign” carried out by "either lookalikes or al-Qaeda." As the difficulties in Iraq require American forces to stay a longer tour than expected, morale can become a serious problem -- a fact known both to the terrorist enemy and to the Fifth Column "peace" left. As Americans come under fire, Occupation Watch wants to deplete the number of Americans who will be shooting back. Weakening the American military -- which is what the peace movement has generally intended -- encourages further terrorist resistance and killing. It puts American soldiers at greater risk , emboldens the enemy and -- if successful -- will shift the battlefield advantage to Saddam and al-Qaeda. Which is exactly what "International Occupation Watch Center" intends.

The organizers of this sabotage effort have a long history of supporting America's enemies and the enemies of freedom generally. The Baghdad effort is the brainchild of Medea Benjamin, a long-time Castro acolyte and a key organizer of the "anti-war" protests as head of "Global Exchange" and instigator of "Code Pink" (a feminist front for the anti-war radicals). She is abetted by long-time Communist Party member and pro-Castro spear carrier, Leslie Cagan. Cagan is the leader of the "moderate" wing of the peace movement, United for Peace and Justice, a brainchild of People for the American Way. Cagan maintained her membership in the Communist Party even after the fall of the Berlin Wall. As head of the anti-Semitic and pro-Communist Pacifica radio network, Cagan is a key promoter of the anti-American cause. Benjamin, who once described Castro’s gulag as “heaven,” was a key proponent of the effort to send “human shields” to terrorist rogue states like Iraq. She was also one of the planners of the 1999 Seattle "anti-globalization" riots. These anti-capitalist farragoes were the real spawning ground of the "anti-war" crusade.

Medea Benjamin laid out a skeletal blueprint for Occupation Watch in her essay “Toward a Global Movement," which was published in the flagship organ of the anti-American left -- The Nation. “Working with local communities where U.S. troops are based, let's start a Bring All the Troops Home campaign to stop the expansion of U.S. bases and start dismantling some of the hundreds of existing bases overseas.” She also called upon these “grassroots teams” to “link up with appropriate local and regional groups” in terrorist states. What are these “appropriate groups”? The fedayeen, perhaps? Hamas? The Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades? Benjamin does not name names, but her exhortation for the Left to “channel the bursting anti-American sentiment overseas” speaks volumes.

At least one member of the Advisory Board for Occupation Watch has called for the murder of U.S. troops and anti-Saddam Iraqis. Author Tariq Ali, who intimated that 9/11 gave America a taste of its own medicine, made his bloodthirsty goals explicit in the May-June 2003 issue of New Left Review. Asking where one could find “any serious obstacle” to the “re-colonizing” of Iraq, Ali forecasted:

First of all, naturally, in the region itself. There, it is to be hoped that the invaders of Iraq will eventually be harried out of the country by a growing national reaction to the occupation regime they install, and that their collaborators may meet the fate of Nuri Said before them.

Nuri Said (1888-1958) was a pro-Western Iraqi ruler with close ties to Great Britain, who actively opposed Communist expansion into the Middle East. When he sent his military to assist besieged Christians in Lebanon, the officers – many of them Communists – staged a violent coup on July 14, 1958. The thugs murdered Nuri Said and ruling King Faisal II, then proceeded to drag Nuri Said’s corpse through the streets of Baghdad. Tariq Ali devoutly wishes this same future for American troops. This echoes the appeal for "a million Mogadishus" uttered by Professor Nicholas de Genova at a Columbia University anti-war teach-in. It is a common theme of the anti-American left although it is not always so baldly stated.

Ali is not the only member of the International Occupation Watch’s Advisory Board with a history of anti-Americanism. The board is in effect a “Who’s Who” of Hate-America radicals. Other luminaries include:

*Jodie Evans co-founder (with Medea Benjamin) of Code Pink. As Jean Pearce has noted on FrontPage, Evans is also institutionally tied to Mike Roselle, founder of the domestic terrorist organization Earth Liberation Front (ELF), “which along with the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) is ranked the No. 1 domestic terrorism threat by the FBI. The FBI attributes over 600 criminal acts and $43 million in damages to the two groups since 1996.”

*Rania Masri of the Iraq Action Coalition. Masri frequently writes for the International Socialist Review, “A Journal of Revolutionary Marxism.” The Iraq Action Coalition itself is tied to Ramsey Clark’s International Action Center, an offshoot of the pro-North Korean Workers World Party.

*Maria Luisa Mendonça, who sits on the Organizing Committee of the World Social Forum, a modern day “Fifth International,” whose meetings draw neo-Communist organizers from around the world. Their most recent meetings were the site of anti-Semitic physical assaults.

*Phyllis Bennis of the Institute for Policy Studies. The IPS has a long and infamous history of supporting Communist regimes around the world and collaborating with their agents.

*Milan Rai, who co-authored the book War Plan Iraq with Noam Chomsky. Rai labelled the war in Iraq, not a liberation, but “a re-branding exercise." He also co-founded the UK branch of Voices in the Wilderness, a Clinton-era group that called for an end to the Iraqi sanctions.

*Pratap Chatterjee of the Berkeley-based anti-capitalist CorpWatch. Chatterjee is also a “reporter” for Berkeley’s Pacifica station KPFA. He was able to combine business with pleasure by broadcasting live from the Seattle riots in 1999.

According to Medea Benjamin, United For Peace and Justice will also work with Quaker organizations and Veterans for Peace. Quaker Associations have a reputation as dovish pacifists, although for the past 40 years groups such as the American Friends Service Committee have become the religious component of the far-left. VFP, which will feature Rep. Jim McDermott as keynote speaker at its annual convention in September and has decried the “murder” of Rachel Corrie, has called for the impeachment, not just of George W. Bush, but also Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and John Ashcroft. According to Benjamin, “We will be testing occupation forces in many ways.” Indeed, she already threw one roadblock in the way of rebuilding this war-torn nation; earlier this year, Benjamin led the fight to topple General Jay Garner as transitional leader of Iraq. Sending one general packing inspired Benjamin to carry out her larger scheme of expelling the entire military from the Middle East.

Naturally the cover for all these anti-American, anti-human rights schemes is.....human rights! Occupation Watch told American authorities that its intention for opening an office in the middle of a combat zone was to serve as a “watchdog,” reporting “possible violations of human rights, freedom of speech and freedom of assembly.” (The Left seemed remarkably unconcerned about these issues when Saddam’s regime was busy filling the mass graves seemingly as plentiful as the nation’s oil reserves.) It also claimed it would provide “accurate information” about the occupation. To this end, their website has posted helpful articles by distinguished commentators like ‘60s pro-Communist activist Tom Hayden. According to Medea Benjamin, it was only after Occupation Watch was firmly entrenched on embattled foreign soil that it “changed” its mission to shipping troops home. Benjamin told a Green Party meeting that this goal came about after she returned from Iraq on July 14, although her Nation article demonstrates months of premeditation. Presumably, telling the authorities her true goals would have complicated her application..

The agenda of Medea Benjamin and her comrades is clear:

Undermine the Bush Administration’s reconstruction efforts through propaganda and dissimulation in the American media.
Demoralize the troops by relaying tales of wavering public support.
Encourage widespread desertion via newfound “conscientious objector” beliefs.
Ask the Quakers to provide moral cover for the sabotage effort.
Weaken the forces of freedom and offer terrorists an easier target, increasing attacks.
These agendas, it is hoped, will create a cycle of demoralization and desertion, leading, to a second Vietnam-style defeat for the capitalist Great Satan. The first cost the lives of two-and-half million peasants in Cambodia and Vietnam after America was forced to leave -- a genocide that gave even Tom Hayden some pause.

If necessary, Occupation Watch may facilitate the actions of “appropriate” indigenous groups by staging acts of sabotage like those its members carried out during the war. Or perhaps they will facilitate terrorism in Iraq the way International Solidarity Movement members do in Israel, always on the periphery yet enabling its ultimate success.

The rest of us should be aware of the radical game Medea Benjamin, Leslie Cagan and their anti-American volunteers are playing. When Jane Fonda visited Hanoi in 1972, she encouraged desertion, telling the troops, “If they told you the truth, you wouldn't fight." Her visit was an act of no-fault treason. But even “Hanoi Jane” did not physically approach GIs to desert the field of battle. Apparently, Medea Benjamin wants to go one step further and a bridge too far.

Copyright 2003 Frontpage Magazine http://www.frontpagemag.com
 
Michael Moore--Stupid White Lies
07.28.03 (2:45 am)   [edit]
[b]Michael Moore, Humbug
He's mendacious and obnoxious, so what accounts for his appeal? [/b]

=http://www.yourlink.com

BY KAY S. HYMOWITZ--Opinionjournal.com
Monday, July 28, 2003 12:01 a.m. EDT

Recently a wealthy Chicago couple named Drobney announced their plan to bankroll a left-wing talk radio station. They needn't bother. The left already has a multimedia star--and even without a radio station, he's bigger than Rush, has more fans than O'Reilly, and sells books faster than Coulter. Followers plead with this "folk hero for the American people" to run for president. Reviewers compare him to Twain, Voltaire and Swift. Unlike Rush & Co., the appeal of this blue-collar megastar extends far beyond the hoi polloi. Hollywood and Manhattan agents wave gazillion-dollar contracts in front of his face. He wins prestigious awards that will never grace the Limbaugh or O'Reilly dens--Oscars, Emmys, Writers Guild Awards and jury prizes at Cannes (where his latest movie received a record 13-minute standing ovation). People stop him on the streets of Berlin, Paris and London--where, according to Andrew Collins of the Guardian, they consider him "the people's filmmaker."

He is, of course, Michael Moore, author of the best-selling "Downsize This!" and "Stupid White Men" and the director of "Roger and Me" and "Bowling for Columbine." Those unfamiliar with Mr. Moore probably learned about him during the Oscar ceremonies in March, when, a few days into the war in Iraq, he won the award for best documentary and came to the stage to speak--or so he said--for his fellow documentary nominees. "We like nonfiction and we live in fictitious times," he intoned. "We live in a time where we have fictitious election results that elect a fictitious president. We live in a time where we have a man sending us to war for fictitious reasons. Whether it is the fictition [sic] of duct tape or the fictition of orange alerts, we are against this war, Mr. Bush! Shame on you, Mr. Bush! Shame on you!"

Well, the speaker ought to know. As critics have pointed out repeatedly, Mr. Moore himself is a world-class expert on "fictition"; in fact, when it comes to truth telling, not to mention logic, you might say that less is Moore. But if the copious charges of lies and distortions don't make a dent, it's because Mr. Moore's fabrications are the very source of his appeal. Not only has he created an enormously clever fictional character whose name is Michael Moore--a contemporary Will Rogers, able to channel Noam Chomsky via Chevy Chase; a working-class, truth-telling schlub in a trucker's hat who shuffles out of his La-Z-Boy to seek answers to folksy questions from the high and mighty--he has also conjured up a fictional America that seductively taps into long familiar populist resentments that have their most recent incarnation in the rage of the antiglobalization left.

In May, I went to see Mr. Moore give a talk to graduating seniors at a liberal-arts college outside New York City, and it was easy to see why the kids went nuts. Mr. Moore recalled the left as I remembered it in the "you-can-change-the-world " 1960s--funny, confident, passionate, idealistic, full of possibility. As you might expect, he poked fun at conservatives, but also at liberals, those long-suffering targets of political satirists. "You must have a conservative in your family--an uncle or someone," he said confidingly. "That person never loses his car keys. He has every key marked: this SUV, that SUV. Our side goes"--he shifts to a timid, whiny voice--" 'Do you know where my car keys are? . . . Where do you want to go to dinner?' 'Gee, I don't know. Where do you want to go to dinner?' Right-wingers go"-he slams the podium and shouts--" Get in the car! We're going to Sizzler!' "

Mr. Moore was humble. He giggled disarmingly at his own jokes. He blushed and looked at his feet during the standing ovation. He told how he was so inexperienced when he made his first movie that, during an interview, Jesse Jackson had to show him how to use his sound equipment. He was also full of concern for the little guy. "Maybe I was raised the wrong way, but my parents taught me we'll be judged by how we treat the least among us." He promised truth in a world of corruption and lies. "When I got out of my seat, and they all rose in standing ovation [at the Oscars], I could just stand there and soak up all the love, blow them a kiss, and get the hell out of here. But there's a little voice, 'You have work to do.' " He was upbeat and inspirational. "Americans are far more progressive than you think. . . . Change this world. Make the playing fields level for everyone. One person can make a difference!"

It was a great act--the operative word here being act. It's best to think of Mr. Moore as always a performer, one who is not only the star of his own show but also its subject matter. And therefore any attempt to understand Mr. Moore or his intense appeal to an alienated left has to begin with the man himself.

Mr. Moore grew up in Flint, Mich., where his father assembled AC spark plugs at General Motors. It was in many respects an ordinary Midwestern working-class boyhood of the 1950s. The young Mr. Moore attended mass with his parents, joined the Eagle Scouts, and learned to shoot; he became a champion marksman, a fact he would mine decades later in "Bowling for Columbine." But Mr. Moore also took to activism at a young age. At 16, he gave a speech in a local contest, condemning the Elks for barring blacks. His speech won the prize, and attracted much media acclaim, including a call from CBS. According to Mr. Moore, it even prompted the Elks to change their policy. In his teens, Mr. Moore briefly joined a seminary, he says--he was a great admirer of the radical priests, the Berrigan brothers--but he soon opted for a more secular pursuit of politics. By 18, he had won a seat on the local school board.
Soon after freshman year, he quit college and started an alternative newspaper called the Flint Voice (later the Michigan Voice), and in 1986 he went to work for the national left-wing magazine Mother Jones. There--not for the first and certainly not for the last time in his life--he managed to alienate his admirers; after four months, he got fired. Mr. Moore claimed political differences, but those at the magazine said he had been utterly unprofessional: arbitrary, suspicious, and impervious to deadlines. In any case, he sued Mother Jones, eventually settling for $58,000, which he used as seed money for "Roger and Me." Though he'd never made a film before, "Roger and Me" was screened at the Telluride film festival, resulting in a distribution deal that made it the highest-grossing nonconcert documentary ever--until "Bowling for Columbine."

Yet for all his fame and achievement, the most important fact about Michael Moore--and the foundation of a populist philosophy that verges on the reactionary--remains his birthplace. Mr. Moore is from Flint the way Odysseus was from Ithaca; his home haunts his every thought and feeling. "This was Flint as I remembered it, where every day was a great day," he says in a voiceover in "Roger and Me," a movie in which he sets out to track down Roger Smith, the General Motors CEO who ordered the factory closings that turned Flint into a rust-belt disaster in the 1980s. The movie is a paean to his beloved birthplace, an evocation of the populist's lost golden age, an industrial counterpart to the agrarian Brigadoon, where life was whole, people were genuine, and everything felt secure. Mr. Moore has a wistful vision of Flint as the birthplace of the modern labor movement with the famous 1937 strike that culminated in the founding of the United Auto Workers, which he presents as a progressive union that integrated the assembly lines and secured its members health-care benefits and enough money to buy homes and cars of their own. He evokes a vanished time, when laborers and corporate elites joined in a mutual spirit of loyalty and honest exertion. "My dad didn't live with this kind of fear," he has said of contemporary job instability. "The social contract then was, if you worked hard and the company did well, he did well."

Mr. Moore's image of Flint makes him the ideal poet of the Naderite left. The city symbolizes the sadness and populist outrage over a world lost to the New Economy and its voracious global corporation. In "Roger and Me," the camera lingers on block after block of boarded-up houses, and Mr. Moore interviews desperate people, some being evicted from their homes. The fallen landscape is for Mr. Moore a symbol of a lost world, in which people like the laboring men of Flint made real stuff--steel, cars, trucks--before being swept away by the flabby and artificial postindustrial economy.

Though not without its appeal, Mr. Moore's vision oozes with more 1950s nostalgia than a Loretta Young fan club. There's hardly a hint of the mechanical repetition endured by the men and women who bolted thingamajigs to widgets on the assembly line; one of the workers interviewed in "Roger and Me" says he is happy to escape "the prison" of the GM factory floor, even though he's taken a cut in salary, but the director does not seem to notice. And while it is true that the UAW was integrated, Flint was hardly an Eden of racial harmony. As Jim Lawrence, a black labor activist at a GM plant in Dayton, Ohio, describes it, during the 1960s "the union gave foremen a blank check to mistreat blacks and keep them out of the high-rate machine jobs and the skilled trades."

More misleading still is the director's melodramatic narrative of corporate downsizing and Flint's decline. During Mr. Moore's golden childhood, when his father was assembling spark plugs, the U.S. was the world's pre-eminent manufacturer. But by the 1980s, that world was passing--and not because of black-mustachioed CEO villains. For the first time, as other industrial nations recovered fully from World War II, American companies were battling genuine competition from abroad; by 1980, the U.S. commanded only 25% of manufacturing output, down from 42% in 1962. Especially hard hit were the heavy industries of the rust belt like the automotive companies. As cheap, well-made foreign cars flooded the market, industries introduced ad campaigns to "buy American." But people were not easily dissuaded from purchasing Honda Civics when their last Impala had dropped its transmission and its muffler.

Faced with these realities, companies had no choice but to cut costs and improve quality and productivity. They laid off workers, and organized those who were left into teams that had to take responsibility for the quality of their product. It wasn't just blue-collar heads that rolled. Restructuring, aided by waves of computerization, meant wiping out entire layers of management, a process that was bloody and sometimes deeply unjust. Mr. Moore is right that CEOs often compensated themselves royally, while their downsized ex-employees worried about buying shoes for their kids. But the fact is that many industries emerged from the carnage more competitive and better equipped to avoid layoffs in future recessions. Back in 1988 Ross Perot, GM's most prominent critic before Mr. Moore, quipped that dealers complained that "when you step on the accelerator, a Cadillac needs to move." Today, as just one example of the success of the nation's industrial restructuring, the Cadillac is moving again, America's luxury competitor to the Lexus and BMW--and talk about Japan as No. 1 stopped years ago.

In "Downsize This!," Mr. Moore attempted to elaborate on the theme of the downsized economy where "Roger and Me" left off, but the book's description of a rust-belt dystopia of pink slips and unemployment checks was out of date long before it hit the bookstores. By 1996, the number of jobs and heft of paychecks in the Midwest had improved markedly. In 1998, the Department of Commerce was writing that "more flexible, market-oriented companies have generated hundreds of thousands of jobs" in Michigan. A 2001 Michigan Economic Development Corp. report noted that with the exception of still-depressed Flint, the state's metropolitan areas saw an increase in personal income between 1989 and 1998, with income rising more than 20% in places like Ann Arbor and Grand Rapids.

Stuck in the Walter Reuther past, Mr. Moore can make no sense of this. A while back, he was appalled when The Nation asked him to be part of a lecture cruise, "to hold seminars during the day and then dock at Saint Kitts at night!" he hissed derisively, as if it were still the era when plutocrats in tuxedos and women in gowns and diamonds dined on caviar and champagne with the ship's captain, while workingmen scrimped for a week's vacation at a dank lake bungalow. He seems not to know that plumbers from Milwaukee and secretaries from Akron fill Caribbean cruise ships these days (though probably not those sponsored by The Nation), and that factory workers often sport two cars--and a boat on a trailer--in their driveways. Our economic system has "got to go," he told Industry Central, before admitting, "Now don't ask me what to replace it with because I don't know." How convenient. He can dwell in his mythical land of Flint and never face the manifest truth that the system that downsized and restructured with such turmoil ultimately improved living standards for millions, while at the same time absorbing huge numbers of poor immigrants.

Mr. Moore is hardly the first to engage in a little nostalgic mythmaking. What makes him unique is his willingness to construct his myths on a scaffolding of calculated untruths. It's an irony worth savoring. Mr. Moore's chief conceit is that he is the lonely truth teller, seeking out the story no one else is brave enough to touch. He repeatedly blasts the media for ignoring issues that only he, a lowly college dropout, has the courage to bring before a hoodwinked public. "In the beginning there was a free press--well not really, but it sounded good," the announcer of his TV series, "The Awful Truth," would say as the show opened. But the awful truth is that Mr. Moore himself is a virtuoso of lying--which is the only way he can give the appearance of truth to his untenable theories.

Let's begin with his bold-faced lies. In an appearance on Comedy Central's "The Daily Show" in March 2002, Mr. Moore announced that during the period that planes were grounded for two days after the September 11 attacks, the Bush administration allowed a Saudi jet to whisk away bin Laden family members over FBI objections. As Snopes.com, an Internet site devoted to tracking down urban legends, points out, the planes did pick up bin Laden family members--on Sept. 18 and 19, days after commercial flights had already begun flying again--and they did so only after the FBI had questioned the departing Saudis. At the college talk, I witnessed another stunner, when Mr. Moore announced--without so much as a blip on the polygraph line--that even though the media report that children in intact families are better off, "every study shows that's a big lie. Children of single mothers do better in life."

Then there are lies of omission, a genre that reaches its apogee in the movie "Bowling for Columbine." Prompted by the horrific murders by Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colo., in 1999, "Bowling" is Mr. Moore's putative attempt to explore why America endures so much more gun violence than other industrialized countries. It seems to make sense when he interviews the punk singer Marilyn Manson, whose violent lyrics the Columbine killers favored. Yet Mr. Moore's point is not what you'd expect. Objecting that to "scapegoat" Mr. Manson for the murders makes as much sense as blaming bowling, since the killers supposedly bowled on the morning of the murders, Mr. Moore listens with reverence to Mr. Manson's theory--which happens to be Mr. Moore's own--that Americans are violent because we live in a "culture of fear." Never mind that the investigators at Columbine have concluded that the killers did not go bowling that morning; the larger point is that Marilyn Manson chose to name himself after Charles Manson, one of America's most infamous mass murderers. Mr. Moore says no word about any of this.

Then there are what we might call artistic lies. "Bowling for Columbine" opens in a branch of the North Country Bank, with Mr. Moore supposedly receiving a free gun in exchange for opening an account. At the end of the scene, he asks a bank employee, "Do you think it's a little dangerous handing out guns in a bank?" before he runs out with the gun in his hand to the beat of a punk rock tune. It is a dazzling opening, full of energy and Strangelovian absurdity. The only problem: It was staged. Commentators have been on Mr. Moore's case about this, some even campaigning to revoke his Oscar, awarded for a genre supposed to be nonfiction. Anthony Zoubeck, a self-described "former Moore fan" who writes for the Illinois State University paper, the Daily Vidette, contacted Helen Steinman, the customer-service representative seen greeting Mr. Moore in the bank. "You can't just come in here and get a gun," Ms. Steinman explained. Mr. Moore "was only supposed to be coming in and pretending to open up a CD. What the girl who opened up the account really told him was that there would be a background check and that he wouldn't get the gun for six weeks."

There are slanted, insinuating lies. In another example from "Bowling," Mr. Moore places a Lockheed Martin executive from Littleton, Colo., right in front of a mammoth, menacing-looking rocket and asks: "So you don't think our kids say to themselves, 'Gee, you know, Dad goes off to the factory every day and, you know, he builds missiles. These are weapons of mass destruction.' " He also observes darkly that the company moves its products through the community late at night, when "the children of Columbine are asleep." But Lockheed Martin does not make weapons in Littleton; it makes weather and communications satellites there. The missile in the film is a refurbished Titan 2 rocket used to launch one such satellite. Moreover, as Mr. Zoubeck learned from a Lockheed spokesman, the company moves the rockets at night because they are so large they need a convoy--not, as Mr. Moore insinuates, because anyone is trying to hide the awful truth about weather satellites.

And there are the lies of exaggeration--details that after marinating in Mr. Moore's brain swell into squishy conspiracy tales, like one of those dried sponges that swell prodigiously in water. Take what happened during a March 2002 book-tour appearance for "Stupid White Men," his 2001 screed against the Bush administration, corrupt corporate power, and (as one chapter title puts it) this "idiot nation." At 11 p.m., Mr. Moore was still signing books for a line of fans at a San Diego school, when event organizers announced that the janitors wanted to close up and go home, since the use permit was up. Mr. Moore paid little attention and went on signing books, until someone--apparently a janitor--called the police about half an hour later. At this point, according to Kynn Bartlett, a disappointed fan who wrote about the event on his Web site, two cops walked in with flashlights--Mr. Bartlett points out that it was dark in the parking lot outside--and calmly announced: "May I have your attention. The use permit for this event expired at 11. You have to leave now." After some grumbling, everyone did.

End of story--until Mr. Moore breathlessly posted his version on his Web site the next day. "Police Raid, Shut Down My Book Signing in San Diego": "I am told that we are getting close to the time when we will have to leave the school," Mr. Moore's fiction begins. "That is not good. Hundreds are still in line." (Mr. Bartlett estimates there were 75.) Mr. Moore continues: "The San Diego police [all two of them, Mr. Bartlett says] are coming down the aisle, their large flashlights out (the auditorium lights are still on, so we all understand the implied 'other' use of the instruments)." People are "visibly frightened," "bolt[ing]" toward the doors. "I remark that it feels like we're in some sort of banana republic or East Berlin, secretly meeting so we can have our little book gathering. Sign quick, Mike, here come the police." There's not a word about janitors forced to work overtime to please celebrity authors.

So does that mean that Mr. Moore's career as the pied piper of union workers is also a lie? The best that can be said is . . . not entirely. Mr. Moore appears to give a good deal of money to unions and charities. But on the road he often stays at the Ritz or Four Seasons, like other movie millionaires. (And he is always on the road: though he loves to describe himself as a slacker, he endured a 47-city book tour for "Downsize This," a tour he made the subject of his disastrously narcissistic movie, "The Big One," and he hit scores of cities for "Stupid White Men.") Former employees have accused him of trying to stop them from joining the Writers Guild and, according to interviews conducted by The Weekly Standard's Matt Labash, of creating working conditions that resemble a "sweatshop" and "indentured servitude."

In fact, there are plenty of indications that Michael Moore is not a compassionate, big-hearted man dedicated to social justice; he just plays one on TV. When asked by a reporter from the Arcata (Calif.) Eye in 2002 why he wasn't speaking at independent bookstores rather than at corporate chains, he exploded in a tirade that revealed his willingness to have his principles--in this case, his distrust of corporate power--take a backseat to his personal vengefulness. "You know in my town the small businesses that everyone wanted to protect? They were the people that supported all the right-wing groups," he ranted. "They were the Republicans in town, they were in Kiwanis, the Chamber of Commerce--people that kept the town all white. The small hardware salesman, the small clothing-store salespersons, Jesse the Barber who signed his name three different times on three different petitions to recall me from the school board. F--- all these small businesses--f--- 'em all. Bring in the chains."

Not that Mr. Moore isn't capable of spouting a few nasty racial stereotypes himself. "The kind of people who fly in airplanes want someone else to clean up their mess; that's why they let hijackers take the plane," said this frequent (first-class) flier late last fall in a one-man show in London. "If the passengers had included black men, those killers, with their puny bodies and unimpressive small knives, would have been crushed by the dudes, who as we all know take no disrespect from anybody. . . . The passengers on the planes on September 11 were scaredy-cats, because they were mostly white."

Mr. Moore's defense when he is charged with lying or hypocrisy, as he frequently is, sounds more like Richard Nixon than Will Rogers. He keeps voicing suspicion that large, nefarious powers are set on destroying him. A bad review of "Roger and Me" in Film Comment? "Film Comment is a publication of the Film Society of Lincoln Center. Lincoln Center had received a $5 million gift from GM just prior to publishing the piece trashing 'Roger and Me.' Coincidence? Or just five big ones well spent?" The failure of his only expressly fictional feature film, "Canadian Bacon"? The distributor, Polygram, buried it, because the company is "owned by Philips of the Netherlands, makers of weapons." Booing at the Oscars? In an interview with the San Jose Mercury News, Mr. Moore insisted, "Those boos were amplified. . . . As I looked out at the audience no one was booing. You could see the camera desperately trying to find people who were disagreeing with me and they couldn't." Criticism in the online magazine Salon? Borders bookstores, one of Salon's advertisers, was angry that he had been supporting workers who wanted to unionize--oh, and Salon's editor has a "personal grudge" against him. Oh, and the writer, who Mr. Moore wrongly assumes belongs to Manhattan's literary elite, is worried because "one of 'them' (i.e. me) has moved into the neighborhood. Ooh, scary. A guy who's supposed to be building Buicks in Flint is now prowling the streets. . . . Somebody circle the wagons! Protect the Starbucks!" As Mr. Moore told a Stanford student who asked him to respond to criticism of "Stupid White Men," "It's always personal." For Mr. Moore, at least that much is true.

So how has an embittered, cynical man with a paranoid streak as wide as Montana and a dysfunctional relationship to the truth been able to present himself so successfully as a compassionate, salt-of-the-earth, truth-seeking hero? One answer is that he makes people laugh. Not only does humor make it harder for charges of lying to stick--as Mr. Moore asked CNN's Lou Dobbs, "How can there be inaccuracy in comedy?"--it also makes people open to what he has to say. "Humor is welcoming," he told the college audience in May. "People want to listen to you at that point. . . . I don't come off as Mr. Know-It-All."

At his best Mr. Moore pokes fun at hypocrisy in time-honored fashion. In one of his yippie-style pranks on "TV Nation," he threw a "Corp Aid" benefit concert on Wall Street to help "needy corporations." In another episode, produced during the Gingrich years, he went to Cobb County, Ga., and opened GOBAC, the Committee to Get Government Off the Backs of Cobb County, whose aim was to send the county's $4 billion in federal aid back to Washington.

Mr. Moore also successfully synthesizes a style that is simultaneously Heartland Joe's Diner and MTV--or " 'Leave It to Beaver' meets Metallica," as he put it in a different context. "Roger and Me," the film that transformed the documentary from a professorial lecture into hip entertainment, is filled with kitschy Americana--beauty queens, marching bands, Anita Bryant songs. Mr. Moore himself speaks slowly in a flat Midwestern accent and looks like someone who buys his clothes at Kmart, yet he still conveys a "Saturday Night Live" sensibility. Mr. Moore's hip humor also flatters the snobbery of many of his voguish fans, who ordinarily would have nothing but contempt for blubbery guys in saggy jeans and trucker's hats.

The other key to Mr. Moore's appeal is his simple Manichaean moral system, the kind that populists traditionally invoke to stir up easy resentments, as with today's alienated left. Mr. Moore's world comprises two groups: stupid but powerful white guys in suits, like Roger Smith; and decent but powerless ordinary folks, like Michael Moore. For Mr. Moore, this is not some kind of comic-book schema; it is as real as sin itself. Nike CEO Phil Knight is "the face of evil." President Bush, today's incarnation of the evil plutocrat in Mr. Moore's mind, is "capable of anything." "The other side [the rich]--what they believe in," Mr. Moore said in an Internet interview, "is in their own kind of sick Darwinism that says only a few shall survive to have the American dream. And they spend their time trying to enact laws to guarantee that the majority won't." Downsizing and welfare reform, which Mr. Moore calls "inherently evil," are both examples of "terrorism" committed by malevolent rich men.

In "Bowling for Columbine," Mr. Moore dwells on the case of the six-year-old boy who shot and killed a classmate in, coincidentally, Flint, Mich.. The boy got into trouble, Mr. Moore informs us, because welfare reform forced his mother, Tamarla Owens, to work two jobs and left her unable to care for her son. Mr. Moore does not mention that the boy and his mother were living in a crack house filled with guns, or that social workers had previously cited Tamarla Owens for being "involved with drugs" as well as for child abuse, including an incident in which, according to Newhouse News Service, she admitted holding down another of her children so that two male friends could beat him with a belt. Nor does he mention that poverty rates and well-being for black children have improved markedly since the "terrorists" passed welfare reform. But why would he? The test of his moral system is the degree of resentment it inspires, not facts and reason.

Much of Mr. Moore's Manichaeism will be yawningly familiar to anyone accustomed to the weird myopia of the far left these days. America--or "the corporation known as The United States of America," as Mr. Moore puts it--is inhabited by a race of greedy, uncaring, racist freaks, equipped with what Mr. Moore calls "the stupid gene." Above all, Americans are violent. "Guns don't kill people; Americans kill people," Mr. Moore has said. World-wide, people suffer for only one reason: not religious or political tyranny, but the malevolent policies of stupid white American men, descended from paranoid Puritans and covetous Italians.

More bizarre still are Mr. Moore's theories about the attacks of September 11, an event that has plunged the filmmaker into an agony of cognitive dissonance, an ideal breeding ground for the paranoid conspiracy theories that come so naturally to him. In hundreds of letters, interviews, and articles, Mr. Moore shows no sign of having read the first thing about al Qaeda, militant Islam or the Middle East. That hasn't stopped him from concluding that Osama bin Laden is no danger. "Ooh . . . he's everywhere," he joked at Stanford, waving his arms bogeyman-like. "Osama bin Laden--he could be here tonight!" "What if there is no terrorist threat," he has asked, and the Bush administration simply wanted an excuse to curtail civil liberties while it pursued its corporate interests?

Mr. Moore seems to forget his own history of stoking fears of terrorism. "There is a rage building in this country, and if you're like me, you're scared sh--less," he wrote in "Downsize This!" "I believe thousands of Americans are only a few figurative steps away from getting into that Ryder truck," like the one Timothy McVeigh packed with explosives. Terrorism by downsized white Americans is one thing: That's scary. But external threats by foreign terrorists? It just cannot be. "Many families have been devastated tonight. This is just not right," Mr. Moore wrote on Sept. 12